I’m spending weeks reading many subfields in analytic philosophy, defensively. All comprehensively nonsense which I’m not going to discuss, but they do treat the phenomena I’m writing about, so I feel I have to be sure I’m not missing anything important.https://twitter.com/PaperFury/status/1027666554677166080 …
-
-
Or more willing to be later surprised by a devastating counterargument to your position that was developed in 1962.
-
That’s the worrisome tail risk, yeah!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I have found a lot of analytical philosophy to be beautiful and to greatly clarify my thoughts. What area are you looking into you don't mind me asking?
-
The vagueness literature at the moment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.