Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
Meaningness's profile
David Chapman
David Chapman
David Chapman
@Meaningness

Tweets

David Chapman

@Meaningness

Better ways of thinking, feeling, and acting—around problems of meaning and meaninglessness; self and society; ethics, purpose, and value.

meaningness.com/about-my-sites
Joined September 2010

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 3 Aug 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      The science replication crisis, social studies of science, and cutting a new deal.pic.twitter.com/HCArEPBoU2

      11 replies 54 retweets 146 likes
    2. Alex Godofsky‏ @AlexGodofsky 3 Aug 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @St_Rev

      You're going to run into the problem that "science is all about power" folks are mostly in favor of the power that's actually succeeded in overriding science.

      2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
    3. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 3 Aug 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @AlexGodofsky @St_Rev

      Some yes, some no. It’s only a minority of SSS people who would buy into the deal, but also only a minority of lab scientists. Some of the SSS folks were/are also already on board. Example: http://www.ece.cornell.edu/people/research_and_teaching.cfm?netid=pad9 …

      2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
    4. Saul Albert‏ @saul 3 Aug 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @AlexGodofsky @St_Rev

      imo the ethnomethodological approach to STS/SSS never focused on power or other abstractions at all. If Lynch's (1985) "Art & artifact" had gathered half the momentum of Latour & Woolgar's (1979) "Laboratory Life" these things might look v different today http://emcawiki.net/Lynch1985a 

      1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes
    5. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 3 Aug 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @saul @AlexGodofsky @St_Rev

      Yup! And, not coincidentally, the ethnomethodological studies of science have been far more willing to understand the scientists’ viewpoint. As mandated by Garfinkel’s “unique adequacy” criterion and “hybrid studies” program, if I understand those correctly.

      1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
    6. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 3 Aug 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @saul and

      I’ve been inspired by (e.g.) Doing, Sormani, and Greiffenhagen, who all dug deep into the subject matter and learned to do science themselves.

      1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
    7. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 3 Aug 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @saul and

      That said, understanding power dynamics in science does also seem valuable. Probably works better bottom-up, i.e. starting from pre-theoretical observation, than when importing a lot of machinery from general sociology?

      2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
      David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 3 Aug 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @Meaningness @saul and

      Embarrassed to say I don’t know of good examples of this, and maybe I’m brainwashed by Garfinkel’s critique of Parsons :)

      2:28 PM - 3 Aug 2018
      • 1 Retweet
      • 1 Like
      • Saul Albert Steven R Clark
      1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
        1. New conversation
        2. Saul Albert‏ @saul 3 Aug 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @Meaningness @AlexGodofsky @St_Rev

          I’m not sure the machinery of general sociology is up to the job :) - What’s coming out of the Garfinkel archive now suggests that the critique was more admiring (from G) and appreciated (by P) than many thought. So maybe EM was being proposed a kind of new deal-for soc. science

          1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
        3. David Chapman‏ @Meaningness 3 Aug 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @saul

          That makes sense. I gather there’s a vast amount of unpublished Garfinkel work. Is that slowly being released by someone? (Sorry to ask naive outsider question)

          2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
        4. 1 more reply

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info