You're going to run into the problem that "science is all about power" folks are mostly in favor of the power that's actually succeeded in overriding science.
-
-
-
Some yes, some no. It’s only a minority of SSS people who would buy into the deal, but also only a minority of lab scientists. Some of the SSS folks were/are also already on board. Example: http://www.ece.cornell.edu/people/research_and_teaching.cfm?netid=pad9 …
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks! I’m probably lacking the background to understand this properly, but the last full paragraph particularly made a lot of sense. (Can you provide a bit of context? Googling reveals that it was edited by Cui Zhiyuan, who you’ve recommended before…)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
Is there a find-able source that this is a screenshot of, or is this just you working around the character limit?
-
It’s extracted from an email I just sent, I’m afraid!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is the basic reason individuals trying to think well should become experts in institutional epistemology. https://www.facebook.com/samo.burja/posts/10209241437791339 …pic.twitter.com/Eotgpd4dCS
-
Yes, we’re strongly in agreement here…
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't psychology/social science particularly prone to this, though? I mean that chemistry and some other fields probably less so.. The starting materials (people) in psychology experiments are highly variable, and also perhaps not representative sample of the global population.
-
Yes; although replications problems have shown up in a wide variety of other fields, to varying extents.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.