Poll reaction thread: Interesting. Before I felt my own answer oscillates between "maybe a little" and "no" depending on how generous vs. defiant I feel at the moment. However, thinking about it over the last 24 hours has yielded a more worked out position: 1/5https://twitter.com/everytstudies/status/1021774117505298433 …
-
-
Quibbles about the word obligated aside, I do think that when we assign levels of credence to propositions, we're obligated to do it without reference to desirability. "Believe" in this case doesn't refer to selecting only one idea to back 100%
-
I agree… and I don’t think we have any obligation to assign levels of credence either. (In situations where one does have to, I agree that the fact/value distinction is important.)
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
David do you think there is ever a time when reasons are not in conflict with each another? I don't think they achieve homeostasis quite like how are body does. We constantly are reformatting our mental hard-drives and re-writing what we think is logical and applicable.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.