Nearly all published technical results are nonsense, so figuring out whose stuff is worth reading is much of the job if you want to produce meaningful results yourself.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Sorting the wheat of meaningful technical results from published chaff is extremely difficult; too hard for any individual. It takes a collaborative network you can rely on.
Show this thread -
Collaborative filtering of worthwhile academic results was once called “peer review”; but once that was formalized, it fell to Goodhart’s Law and ceased to function. So now you need to find peers who can tell you what is worth reading—and why you shouldn’t believe others.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.