This is an absurd claim to make about a program that knew like 50 words if typed in exactly vs programs that can recognize thousands spoken by hugely variable human voices and then use these words to affect real hardware/software that people use.
-
-
-
So I got curious about this, and have taken a very basic look at the Siri backend API. It appears that you specify a thing it can do just as a functional call, and give it the words the user is supposed to say to fill in the parameters. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sirikit …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow! Been hoping u would write more about your AI experience. Great read
-
Thank you! Glad you liked it
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wait why is there no Google SHRDLU then?
-
Well you can read Winograd’s book where he says why he thinks there isn’t…
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Reminds me of a tweet I saw recently proposing a conference called "In Retrospect", where researchers with very influential past work are invited to present how their thinking has changed since then
-
That would be interesting!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I've wondered how good a "painstaking" implem of NLP would be: try to encode language in rules and heuristics as fine as possible (for which it of course needs some kind of representation of the context). Many expert-years of work, but could be better than what we have.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
traditionally Cog.Sci was a mixture of linguistics, comp.sci. psych, philo, and neuro
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.