Some responses to this exemplify a particular disagreement pattern I've been trying to articulate for some time. Someone complains about open disdain for white men, to which someone else responds, sarcastically, that white men "have it so tough" or something to that effect. ->https://twitter.com/sullydish/status/1012711850788753409 …
-
Show this thread
-
The first person's objection to being disrespected is read by the second as claiming victimhood status, which is required for sympathy. Then this interpretation is mocked for being absurd. ->
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
But that's wrong. It's not a demand for sympathy, it's a demand for basic respect, for the same courtesy that others are considered entitled to. The validity of such a demand isn't dependent on your (disadvantaged) standing in the same way. ->
4 replies 2 retweets 16 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @everytstudies
If this pattern is common, it suggests that many people in disadvantaged demographic groups have been implicitly taught that they deserve basic decency ONLY BECAUSE of that membership. Rather than despite or regardless of it. Seems plausible; and if so, very sad.
2 replies 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @everytstudies
The question of *why* everyone would deserve basic respect is gaping rn. Used to be - because God in all of us later - because Reason - because Agency Atm each is thought discredited. Will worsen until we have broadly accepted ideas about what is noble in human beings.
4 replies 2 retweets 13 likes
Yes, this is important!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.