is there a pithy law & economics term for “the law as various observers believe it to be” vs what it actually is in practice?
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
not quite because this is about mistakes about both
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana @Meaningness
could be mistaken about what the law says (high information cost to find out) and how it’s enforced (same)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @literalbanana
I was reading this paragraph from Searle’s “Literal Meaning” when I saw this tweet, and it strikes me there is some connectionpic.twitter.com/od2lopWFqF
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
-
Replying to @literalbanana
Maybe an argument against legal strict constructionism, at least if that is taken too far https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/voices.uchicago.edu/dist/9/177/files/2008/01/searle-literal-meaning.pdf …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Aaaand I just did a web search for “probabilism” to make sure I was using the word correctly, and turned up this: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12441a.htm …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.