Stage 3 institutions do not have explicit boundaries and they encompass all of life. In this way they function kinda like a dialect continuum where they slowly blend into each other and you only get sharp boundaries where people don't interact with each other.
-
-
Yes, I agree re the limitations of typical vol orgs. Also, see no reason that stage 5 institutions should not also operate with commitment, without being defined by it - each stage contains the functionality of the previous ones.
-
My perspective was to see an org which works on multiple stages as the symbiosis of multiple orgs. ex: if one sees the Wikipedia project as a stage 5 org then the Wikimedia foundation and the Wikipedia community are stage 4 and 3 symbionts.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe the stage 4 institutionalised commitment is more akin to system loyalty, & becomes capacity to commit to specific activiy in st 5 structures. In a context of flexibility, commitment is localised.
-
I hadn't seen this when I replied to your other tweet. Something I have to ponder about.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.