Can you recommend an overview of everything wrong with probabilistic epistemology? I haven’t found one. There’s lots of papers that say “this particular objection is fatal, so why don’t you guys stop pretending,” but maybe no compendium of those?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @zarzuelazen
Yes… also you have to actually understand what is going on, in terms of a workable ontology (e.g. categories) and background facts stated in those terms. That is not generally captured by “vagueness” or “approximation.”
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.