Can you recommend an overview of everything wrong with probabilistic epistemology? I haven’t found one. There’s lots of papers that say “this particular objection is fatal, so why don’t you guys stop pretending,” but maybe no compendium of those?
Yes… also you have to actually understand what is going on, in terms of a workable ontology (e.g. categories) and background facts stated in those terms. That is not generally captured by “vagueness” or “approximation.”
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.