Can you recommend an overview of everything wrong with probabilistic epistemology? I haven’t found one. There’s lots of papers that say “this particular objection is fatal, so why don’t you guys stop pretending,” but maybe no compendium of those?
-
-
I’d say probabilism is basically a cognitive gamble that allows humans and machines to pretend to think until they’re caught out. Poetically appropriate. “Correlation is not causation” is less a warning than the ignored CYA-TOS you click through to use probabilism.
-
Unfortunately this has become standard practice in many/most sciences. Result: replication crisis.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.