Can you recommend an overview of everything wrong with probabilistic epistemology? I haven’t found one. There’s lots of papers that say “this particular objection is fatal, so why don’t you guys stop pretending,” but maybe no compendium of those?
Thanks! I had read the SEP article; forgot that it does collect objections. It’s not comprehensive, but is a good start! I didn’t know Huemer’s article; will take a look!
-
-
BTW I just remembered about this one, is even spicierhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/phpr.12445 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.