Awesome. Thanks. Looking forward to your response, @Meaningness
When you can more-or-less map the entities required by DT (or any mathematical framework) onto a situation, the math may give more-or-less meaningful results. Sometimes, for DT, this wins big!
-
-
Sometimes you can’t meaningfully map DT onto a situation (because there aren’t identifiable preferences or actions or outcomes). Sometimes you can do that and it still doesn’t work, because math isn’t mostly-truth preserving, only absolute-truth preserving.
-
So I think I still don’t understand what
@ESYudkowsky’s claim here is. Is the claim that you *can* always do a mapping? Or that you *should* always do a mapping? Or that *if* you can, then you should? Or that in somehow you should even when you can’t? - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.