"The correct analysis of all physical events" - I don't even understand what you think I mean, or what or what this could possibly mean, unless you believe that I believe something incoherent rather than wrong. It's like saying that a fish is a correct analysis of all events.
-
-
Seems like DT is used as Tool or Law. Many tools useful depending on agent/context/intent/goal. DT as Law analyzes agents/tools generally. Are there alternates? As Tool => yes, As Law => no(?) Am I Accurate? Helpful? Else?
-
I guess I’m not sure enough I understand what
@ESYudkowsky means by Law to respond to this confidently! - 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Returning to your Facebook post, I take it that it is an attempt to characterize the difference (Law vs Toolbox). I don’t think that is accurate; I think I understand and use both of those ways of thinking. But, I can’t be sure. And I don’t have a good alternative model!
-
Btw that you think you use both styles possibly suggests that you are a toolbox thinker, according to the original argument. (The argument might be wrong, but that is a separate point.)
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can you put a finger on the difference in your cognitive styles? (Eliezer comes across as very clearly to me here btw., no idea how it is for others.)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.