...wantonly giving up things you say you want, we can see your behavior as corresponding to this shape. Conversely, if we can't see your behavior as corresponding to this shape, you must be visibly shooting yourself in the foot.'"
-
-
As for the specialness, I am guessing that you believe all rational methods can be viewed as applications of DT, and that DT is unique in having this property. If “rational” is defined as “applications of DT” (which you came close to doing earlier) then this is correct.
-
However, I would say that context-free parsing with a pushdown automaton is a rational method. (We may disagree just as a matter of definition! Which is fine of course.)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
"The correct analysis of all physical events" - I don't even understand what you think I mean, or what or what this could possibly mean, unless you believe that I believe something incoherent rather than wrong. It's like saying that a fish is a correct analysis of all events.
-
Once you inject preference and uncertainty into a perspective on an event, however fuzzily, DT validly describes certain laws governing performance, like coherence theorems. If and only if your choices cannot be viewed as coherent, the strategy is dominated, etcetera.
- 25 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.