Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @Meaningness
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @Meaningness
-
Prikvačeni tweet
Much of my explanation of how and why rationality works (the middle part of the book) is a simplified presentation of ethnomethodological concepts and findings in easier language.
It’s hip! You need to be able to say “ethnomethodology” confidently
https://meaningness.com/eggplant/ethnomethodological-flip …pic.twitter.com/aGLORZV4zb
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I was going to have the photo be a really messy laboratory, but on looking at some via image search I suspect that if you haven’t worked in a wet lab, you can’t even see whether it’s tidy or a mess. Better use a messy kitchen I think!
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I’m thinking this gets an accompanying diagram showing “the real world” as a photo of a mess and “the formal model” as a Greek temple floating in a cloud with a Greek philosopher emitting some well-formed formulae. And some random arrows connecting them.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
“Passing over these considerations may result in predictable patterns of rationalist failure.”pic.twitter.com/T2NAJSb8Ip
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
Nice theory! But I expect it will be replaced in a few years by Eggs-bar Theory, proposing hierarchical application of the various components for breakfast.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
“Aspects of the Theory of Breakfast” Formal rationality is not much help in making an omelet! Here’s a better way… The title is a play on Noam Chomsky’s “Aspects of the Theory of Syntax,” a founding text in cognitivism. https://meaningness.com/eggplant/reasonableness-aspects …pic.twitter.com/v6m9zVJJUy
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
The whole interview is delightful and funny and well worth reading for an understanding of the early days of statistics, how the field developed out of the second world war and into the 50s and 60s at Stanford and MIT: https://projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.ss/1032280306 …pic.twitter.com/1ipu7rlilU
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Letter #12 in my dialog with @vervaeke_john. This one isn’t very interesting; I’m linking it here for completeness. If you haven’t read the exchange, start at the beginning instead; there’s some good stuff in it!https://letter.wiki/conversation/209#letter_1454 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Summary of "mere reasonableness," with a Gigantic Chart and an application: breakfast!
https://meaningness.com/eggplant/reasonableness-aspects …pic.twitter.com/M9IAyGg6UH
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Unexpected discovery: Keith Stanovich has a chapter on “metarationality” in his 2010 “Decision Making” book. He uses the word to mean evaluating preferences in a formal decision-theoretic framework. Which is important, and consistent with my use, but a much narrower conception.pic.twitter.com/0BOnWesFH5
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This fascinating misunderstanding was once used to prove that space rockets were impossible. Calculations showed that the most explosive substance then known, TNT, would be insufficient to power one.https://twitter.com/curiouswavefn/status/1223745337359130624 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
my philosophy is indexical, yours is limited in scope, theirs totally fails to generalize
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
every seemingly innocent fragment of information is secretly plotting how to escape its context and cause trouble
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
I wish people were better at distinguishing "I understand where this person is coming from" from "I think this person is correct". I see way too many "lol can you imagine believing X" posts, and I think if you *can't* imagine it you're probably lacking crucial empathy skills.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
1/ Did you know that Vannevar Bush (you know, the guy who helped enable everything from radar to the manhattan project, the NSF to memexes) wrote an autobiography? Turns out that yes he did, it's been out of print since the 70's, and it's *excellent* BOOK REPORT THREAD
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
In which I object to philosophers looking down at the sort of science done by the vast majority of professional scientists: https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2020/01/30/in-praise-of-normal-science/ … (lunchtime
@ForbesScience repost)Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
From
@Meaningness - “Reasonableness works directly with reality, whereas rationality works with formalisms. Rationalism assumes that a formalism somehow reflects reality, and glosses over questions about how that works.” https://meaningness.com/eggplant/reasonableness …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
David Chapman proslijedio/la je Tweet
“A rational theory is primarily epistemological; it wants to be a collection of true beliefs. A meta-rational understanding is primarily ontological; it wants to be a collection of useful distinctions“ From
@meaningness in https://meaningness.com/eggplant/cognitive-science …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The part of your brain that tries to explain everything in terms of wooden spoons. https://meaningness.com/eggplant/cognitive-science …pic.twitter.com/RRnuOsd2KO
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
(This via
@JessieSunPsych, one of my main sources for science reform news)Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.