If you have to cheat and change the rules to get a nominee confirmed that means you have a very poor candidate. #Gorsuchfilibuster
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I know your memory is not what it was, but you started this when you refused to do your job and even meet with judge Garland. Hypocrite!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Nope. Not buying your propaganda...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@GOP Hypocrisy: abdicating the Senate's consitutional duty to advise and consent. MERRICK GARLAND!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
just remember Mitch changing the rules for a nom who can't even get 60+ Senate votes will come back to bite you in the ass...
#DemsturnThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
NO! If he can't get 60 votes, it's not the time nor the person.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When you justify murder by saying the other side committed assault.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pot, meet kettle
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you should be ashamed of yourselves for the way you completely overlook the American people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, but you actually pressed the button... have you no decency?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
REPUBLICAN LIE REPUBLICAN B S .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I only see your personal hypocrisy.. U didn't let vote happen last year you should be blocked thus yr. good for goose, good for gander.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pull the Obama trick! Vote in the middle of the night and get her done!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SenateMajLdr does not know hypocrisy then. Taking away a presidents right to appoint a member to Supreme Court. That's garlands seat -
garland would never be confirmed as the reps had 52 seats
-
Should have had at least a vote or a chance.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.