2/2 See @McClatchyDC. If your editors or your idea of competition does not allow you to switch to "outside in" reporting... you're screwed.
-
-
Replying to @jayrosen_nyu
@jayrosen_nyu Beyond crowdsourcing, can you explain where you're going with this comment?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @McClatchyDC
Jay Rosen Retweeted Jay Rosen
@McClatchyDC Part 2/2 does not make sense without part one. https://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/303905031814537216 … Reference is oblique: to Iraq War coverage outer rings.Jay Rosen added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayrosen_nyu
@jayrosen_nyu So you're saying if we can't get access to a person or location, we report outside by getting info via other methods, etc.?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @McClatchyDC
Yes,
@McClatchyDC. But you don't want to switch for light and transient causes. Might be times you have to decide: outside-in or inside-out?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jayrosen_nyu
@jayrosen_nyu How you are drawing these conclusions about our work? Did you see these reports? http://bit.ly/NekkIz , http://bit.ly/VtEWAs3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @McClatchyDC
@McClatchyDC Your series on polygraph policy is a good example of what@jayrosen_nyu terms "outside in" reporting.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ap_org @jayrosen_nyu Thanks. When we saw the tweet yesterday, we saw part 2/2 first and thought we have been "outside in" for a while.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.