Child mutilator.
https://twitter.com/DrRobertHamilt1/status/1060697012901826560 …
Um what???? Male circumcision is for the health of the child it prevents illnesses reduced the risk of diseases like HIV. You need to educate your self if you think it is wrong.
-
-
Look up some of the cons to circumcision. Go on, educate yourself. I dare you.
-
If you know anything I am missing though please send it. As a skeptic I am always open to be shown I am wrong. I just don’t get calling a dr a monster for conducting a common procedure that is more or less harmless from what I have found, out side of racist antisemitic stuff.
-
The way the Jewish perform it, ritualistically, with the mouth is detestable to me.
-
That is fair I am not supporting it as a religious practice. I am saying people have structure caused by it or child genital cancer. And as you know some places it appears to help with STI. I never said all babies should be circumcised just that calling that dr a monster is nuts.
-
The practice as some religious ritual has no purpose other than magic your very right. But saying it causes problems seems to be about as sound from the reading I have done. It seems to be more of a presence thing. In developed countries. I am no DR but I trust the WHO.
-
At least more than I do a bunch of twitter people telling me I am lying. Which makes no sense. I am just citing what I have seen published by the aap and WHO.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You want to cite the white papers on the studies to back up your claim? Or do you want to just cut the shit and stop talking nonsense?
-
Well, I'll be damned. Not only did you provide a reputable citation you also interpreted the results correctly......I am NOT used to people backing up their claims on Twitter. Clearly you were not talking shit and I stand corrected. Well done!pic.twitter.com/CUeR6xWFOW
-
Hey thanks for being the one person who read the thing and did not just keep shouting at me and calling me names.
-
Well I was a jerk to you- and for that I apologize. But I do admit when I’m wrong and I appreciate people who support their claims with facts. I’ll follow you and back you up should anyone give you crap.
-
Hey thanks. I often enter the fray of pseudoscience in an attempt to input some reason. I like when people ask for the evidence and I like to be proven wrong. We are all able to have wrong opinions of medicine and science but what matters most is our ability to learn.
-
I have come to find many people are not willing to change their preconceptions so I gain and lose followers on a daily bases like her. not here for that though if I can show one person reality I take it as a win. Like you if you can prove your claim I will admit I am wrong.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How does circumcising a baby protect them against HIV?
-
Adult male circumcision is a recognized low-cost method of reducing HIV in settings where the disease is prevalent and medical resources are limited. See: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29617778 Inner surface of foreskin is highly vulnerable to HIV; removing foreskin substantially reduces risk.
-
Oh. Adult male. Okay, well that's fine then....I'm totally in favour of adult males getting circumcised if they so elect to. Sounds like there's no reason to do it to babies....awesome! Glad we cleared that up

-
Yep. By all means. Adult men, cut that foreskin off! Or just practice safe sex. That might be easier.
-
That is a logical fallacy to assume I am saying circumcision removes the need for safe sex practices.
-
The part you missed is the bit where babies aren't actually having sex and therefore this argument in favour of circumcision isn't relevant until adulthood.
-
See my other point about cancer and uti.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.