Particularly important is the opinion on (temporary) participation of international experts in selection bodies: “Venice Commission... considers it necessary that, following a repeat vote, the vote of the group with at least two votes by international experts should prevail” 2/5
-
-
Show this thread
-
“This is not only important to establish trust in the
Judiciary, but it is also acceptable from the viewpoint of national sovereignty...the current members of the HCJ...would only be suspended and the decision on dismissal would remain with the appointing body.” 3/5Show this thread -
“Finally, all decisions of the Ethics Council, both concerning candidates and current members of the HCJ, can be appealed to the Supreme Court. Therefore, the final decision remains with a national body in all cases.” 4/5
Show this thread -
Following this advice would give certainty also to international partners like
and others who will be invited to propose experts. 5/5
@DRazumkov@AndriyYermak@verkhovna_radaShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


