If Torah was perfect and complete, there would have been no need for Jesus to have come.
In learning God’s ways...of course the circumcision topic is quite clearly addressed in other areas as a non-requirement for gentiles
-
-
The four things mentioned were related to participating in the Roman pagan temples. By joining any synagogue, they would receive the Roman exemption. But they were clearly not expected to "eventually" take on Torah.
-
Some claim the answer was "Torah eventually" and thus a gradual "yes." This argument is used to make the very clear "no" into a "yes." This is pretty brazen Scripture twisting in my opinion.
-
Ok. So, I’m not required. I believe that while-heartedly. Only the blood of Jesus & active faith in Him saves me. I also agree with that. However, what is scripturally wrong with a gentile believer, like myself, choosing to observe the feasts & eat Kosher out of love only for God
-
Who said that? So long as you don't go down the dark road too common among Hebrew Roots groups that says that those who do take on Torah observance do not love God or are in sin.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.