For reference, you can see the lawsuit here. https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/press_assets/nov-17-doc-2.pdf …
-
-
Show this thread
-
Here's the jist of the lawsuit. Basically, in August, the powers that be in
#Nevada decide to send out millions of mail-in ballots to everyone in the state, whether they requested them or not. They did not prepare their vote counting people for the massive influx of votes.Show this thread -
Normally, around 80,000 mail-in ballots. In
#elections2020 they received close to 700,000#NevadaVotes. Far beyond their capability to verify. (NV law requires signatures on mail-in ballots be matched.)Show this thread -
So Clark County, in its infinite wisdom, unilaterally decide to use signature matching machines to verify signatures instead of election personnel. They us Agilis Ballot Sorting Systems to do this. However, there was a problem.
Show this thread -
The machines use DMV signature records to match the ballot signatures to. But the machines require a minimum resolution of 200 dpi of the source image to make a match. The DMV keeps signature records at far below that resolution.
Show this thread -
Because of this, when the votes were fed into the machine, they had a rejection rate of upward of 70%. When this issue was presented to
#ClarkCounty election officials, their response was to turn the sensitivity of the machine's AI software down far below recommendations.Show this thread -
We're talking FAR below the recommended sensitivity. Almost to zero. As a result, the Agilis machines went from rejecting 70% of votes to rejecting almost 0% of votes.
#ClarkCounty "verified" around 130,000 votes in this way.Show this thread -
Thus, the Agilis machines (illegally) replaced election personnel in the signature verification process of 130,000 mail-in ballots. The machines were used in contrast to other states which use them to flag the most obvious signature discrepancies so that personnel can review them
Show this thread -
The lawsuit argues that the Agilis machines malfunctioned & made it inherently unreliable from a scientific perspective for unilaterally approving or rejecting signatures using its artificial intelligence protocols.
Show this thread -
Despite these obvious issues,
#Nevada election officials relied exclusively on these machines to verify over 130,000 mail-in ballot signatures without any further review of said ballots by trained election personnel.Show this thread -
The margin of difference between
#TrumpvsBiden in the#NevadaElection was 33,596 votes. We have 130,000 unverified ballots counted by the Agilis machines with almost 0% rejection rate after a malfunctioning 70% rejection rate.Show this thread -
At the very least, these 130,000 ballots need to be manually reviewed and audited. But knowing how corrupt
#Sisolak &#ClarkCounty officials, as well as the Harry Reid machine, are, we'll see if anything actually happens here. But this is no small issue.Show this thread -
The lawsuit covers a vast array of voting issues and
#fraud in#Nevada but this signature verification issue is probably the most easily provable & fixable. If even a small percentage of those 130k votes are eliminated, it could have a big impact on on the#2020Election.Show this thread -
@OMBReport@GeeksGamersCom@reviewjournal@LasVegasSun@FOX5Vegas - can this get some coverage? It's a pretty big deal.Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.