To clarify: do you consider their rhetorical and pedagogical effects incidental, and perhaps even mostly irrelevant?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @vihartvihart
If one acknowledges no generally valid principles of art criticism, then as an artist one is essentially playing tennis without a net.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MathPrinceps @vihartvihart
Art without constraint tends to degenerate into self-indulgence, just as power without accountability leads to damaging abuses.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @vihartvihart
I think a large part of the artist's creative obligation is to devise fruitful constraints. One must not only play the game, but invent it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MathPrinceps @vihartvihart
And, having invented it, one must scrupulously referee one's own play. But most important, of course, is to prove its aesthetic fertility.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @vihartvihart
What effect do you most hope to have on those who experience your art? I presume you must wish above all to engender an emotional response.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
These matters are of course very subtle, and I have no wish to pose as an authority. But this is worth pondering: http://bit.ly/2eFZWHb
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.