@vihartvihart This statement seems defensible only if accompanied by a detailed explanation of the meaning of the verb "to prove."
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @vihartvihart
@vihartvihart But clearly some minimum standard of rigor must be met; you would not admit error merely because someone accused you of error.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @vihartvihart
@vihartvihart But do you make assertions about matters alien to your experience? And do you always defer to more experienced persons?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @vihartvihart
@vihartvihart And it's not beside the point: if you never speak in ignorance, then the contingency you cite never arises (and so is vacuous)
12:41 AM - 30 Nov 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.