Yes, exactly that!
-
-
2 replies 1 retweet 17 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @DRMacIver
An interesting justification for silence on these matters -- and, curiously, one more common among the best elder mathematicians -- is that keeping mum prevents talented young people from wasting their time in hero-worship-motivated yet doomed and misguided attempts at imitation.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @MathPrinceps @Meaningness
My suspicion is that it is more commonly just vanilla curse of knowledge and people not consciously knowing things that they have very heavily internalised.
2 replies 1 retweet 21 likes -
I very rarely find that people are able to articulate most of the heuristics and intuitions they use constantly unless you walk them through it - it requires much more metacognition than most people routinely deploy.
3 replies 2 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @DRMacIver @Meaningness
It requires more motivation than most people usually feel -- and more time and effort that most people are prepared to devote to it. Which is especially odd, when you reflect that, with this particular form of wealth as with all others, you can't take it with you.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @MathPrinceps @DRMacIver
OK, here’s the plan. We deploy elite special forces units to capture all the Fields Medalists and take them in black helicopters to a purpose-built underground fortress on Svalbard, and use secret CIA psy-op interrogation techniques to force them to reveal what they know
3 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @DRMacIver
Honestly, what impresses me most is how profoundly the attitudes of great masters vary from art to art. Itzhak Perlman, Emanuel Ax, Midori -- all have put a great deal of effort into transmitting their tacit knowledge. The number of great mathematicians who do likewise?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MathPrinceps @DRMacIver
Zero, I think. Rota and Thurston are partial exceptions. Any others?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Oh, and Terry Tao.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
The thing is, they become more common, the further back in time you go. This is what worries me most: the practice of apprenticeship itself seems to be decaying. Once there were giants: Lefschetz, Zariski, Chern, Bott. Fewer and fewer great mentors now.
-
-
yes, this is my sense too! something very strange seems to have happened to mathematics sometime in the last ~50 years and i wish i knew what
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It's a gradual process of decay, I think, that was for a time largely masked by the unusual longevity of those great masters directly connected by intimate personal ties to the last generation of mathematicians whose education took place largely outside of modern institutions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.