But Feynman's idol, P A M Dirac, came to view the matter quite differently -- and not on abstract grounds, but rather as a result of chastening experience. He abandoned one of his own deepest innovations because it was contradicted by experiment. But the experiment was wrong.
-
-
This is, of course, why Popper is not popular in philosophy of science today. Clear provision of the (sadly subjective) probability “the experiment/falsification is wrong” would suggest why scienists hold the framework still of value. Probability(refuted)is key.
@Knutti_ETHThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.