Almost all physics crackpots are men. Men standing atop Mt. Stupid are blessed with supreme confidence. Crackpots reside there permanently.pic.twitter.com/siOFKFCzHi
This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.
Mathematical physicist and mentor to mathematically talented youth. Talent is that which bridges the gap between what can be taught and what must be learned.
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
Almost all physics crackpots are men. Men standing atop Mt. Stupid are blessed with supreme confidence. Crackpots reside there permanently.pic.twitter.com/siOFKFCzHi
The graph is qualitatively incorrect. The asymptotic behavior of this curve is not unbounded growth, but rather gradual approach to a limiting value substantially lower than the peak of "Mount Stupid." True experts do not want to express an opinion. They want to be left alone.
I agree, Laurens. Actually it's even more complicated: true experts often like to talk to other true experts and near-experts - this is what conferences are for - but often prefer to be left alone by reporters, floundering beginners, crackpots, etc.
Actually, I meant to be quite precise in my earlier remark. True experts specifically dislike expressing opinions -- partly because they fear that they may unduly bias the thinking of others, but mostly because the formulation of a public opinion is as tiresome as defending it.
Most of the understanding of a true expert is inarticulate. It derives from a vast amount of penetrating private reflection and experimentation. The attempt to distill and express the fruit of all this effort is exhausting, and seldom brings the expert any real satisfaction.
It is simply more rewarding to exploit than to share one's expert insight. Gauss eloquently acknowledged this. "Procreare jucundum, sed parturire molestum," was his formulation: to conceive is a pleasure, but to give birth is painful. Communicating what one understands is hard.
The chore might be less onerous, were expert understanding not so different from ordinary erudition. Not only is it much less readily communicable, but its acquisition demands a devotion to private reflection that subtly isolates and alienates as it enlightens.
The trouble, alas, is that a sort of Heisenberg principle seems to apply to the public expression of expert insight: the more precise it is, the less illuminating it is; the more illuminating it is, the less precise it is. And imprecise statements engender tiresome controversy.
Newton is perhaps the signal example of a true expert whose aversion to tiresome controversy led him to refrain from attempting to express more than a tiny fraction of what he knew. But he is merely an extreme; most great masters die with most of their music still within them.
Newton is also a great example of an expert who might now be considered a crackpot for his work on alchemy and biblical chronology - the two fields that occupied him most in his later life. But standards change, so I wouldn't say someone into alchemy back then was a crackpot.
It seems to me that Newton always pursued one goal: to expose the plan of the creator of all things. He sought to know the mind of God, and had the (essentially heretical) audacity to imagine that he might succeed. He escaped Galileo's fate mostly by keeping silent.
Yes, he would have gotten in serious trouble, possibly executed, for his unitarian beliefs back when Cambridge was repeatedly invaded by Protestants and then Catholics during the religious wars of that era!
And he had powerful allies, too. Without them, he would never have been able to evade the decidedly anti-unitarian oaths of piety required to be Lucasian professor (let alone all the other even more prominent roles he subsequently played.) Even a super-genius needs some clout.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.