Conversation

The 'natural immunity is unreliable' theory has done a lot of damage. It's OK to have a wrong hypothesis but public health leaders have pushed their theory way too long after data became overwhelmingly clear,yet remarkably clinging to their outdated theory
Replying to
The natural immunity is unreliable hypothesis was the opposite hypothesis many of us had last year given the observational data of doctors & nurses consistently saying "We are rarely seeing re-infections and when they occur they are not severe" Clinical wisdom that was dismissed.
22
1,640
Getting this wrong has resulted in tremendous avoidable harm: 1. Thousands of seniors died waiting for a vax when we were vaxing ppl w/ nat imm 2. Bad guidance to the world 3. Heart complications from vaxing kids w/ nat imm 4. Kids kicked out of sch 5. Distracting from vax effort
29
1,879
Replying to
Never understood this as well and only increases the distrust in politicians and public health. Had Covid last July with mild symptoms and have donated plasma each 5-6 weeks since. Been positive for Covid antibodies for 14 months. But guess I’m an unvaccinated threat. 🤦‍♂️
13
367
Show replies
Replying to
The lab test that shows you HAVE covid (and the date) or that you’ve HAD covid should be able taken into consideration. Instead of “vaccinated” it should be “immune”.
2
58