Because the dominent culture is file based development. That mental model is so deeply engrained in their thinking that they can not see what you are telling them. And the implications of the image are very profound but not immediately evident.
-
-
-
Indeed. Agree. But at the same time, when virtualization/containers came in, it was also quite different from what it was before (comparison to file-based approach) and they also needed to change their mental model. But yes, seems the mental gap to
#Smalltalk is bigger. - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Es la misma pregunta que me hice hace 25 años cuando aprendí Smalltalk. Obvio no con esas comparaciones.
-
Exacto. Incluso a mi también me costó un tiempo entender el concepto. Y encima docker y máquinas virtuales lo entienden al toque. O sea que por algún motivo que desconozco es claramente más difícil de ver el mismo concepto en Smalltalk
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
-
Tweet je nedostupan.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
-
-
-
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?
-
Some devs are just used to using flat ASCII text files as their development universe. They got file extensions yo. They get to package their program every time they compile it, debug their compile type error, link it, debug their link errors, and on occasion run & debug it.
#Slow
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
It's incredible how easy, small and portable Smalltalk deployments are
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.