In a pandemic, public health scientists have a duty to communicate with everyone, and to accept media invitations from left and right, friendly and hostile, etc. If not, they are hacks. 1/2
-
-
Public health professional has a duty to follow the science and admit when they are wrong. (read, Your friends in the GBD) etc, if not, they are hack 3/3
-
"follow the science " as if it was a monolithic entity with no dissent and no ambiguity/ highly complex matters with arrays of different options/solutions. There are different ways/paths to solve certain problems
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seems like they have no problem picking out both sides of the argument when it comes to military conflict if they don’t agree with it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Completely agree. That's just not the way the memetics work, though. And that's why we're in this hole.https://empathy.guru/2021/02/27/the-predictable-memetic-collapse-of-contemporary-journalism/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is like saying good a math school should have people that teach 2+2=5. There is no need to have people that are incorrect. Especially in a time of crisis.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Absolutly agree
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How sad it is that the fair and balanced ethic in journalism died years ago. We need it back now more than ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.