Look at Norway. #COVIDVaccination rate >90% over 65. By September it‘ll be more than 90% over 50.pic.twitter.com/oiFS8e2c85
"England can now celebrate the achievement of protecting the elderly and vulnerable. Enjoy the return of family and friends, social gatherings, religious services, cultural events, sports, holidays, restaurants and pubs. Welcome back to the old normal."https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/sweden-shows-that-the-uk-s-third-wave-won-t-sting …
-
-
-
Silly, because there were hardly any serious cases in Norway.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
For how long has England protected the elderly and vulnerable before the booster merry go round begins, and do we really have a good grip on vaccine adverse events in this group?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well at least until flu season comes back around
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Didn’t know that vaccine passports and forced injections with experimental vaccines were part of the old normal or can be perceived and accepted as “normal“ at all.
-
Its not, now they have to replace the politicians that enforce those rules! Rules wont go away if no pressure is put on politicians
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“In its first two waves, the UK did not succeed in following a focused protection approach. The elderly, whether in care homes or elsewhere, were exposed and suffered the predictable consequences …” https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/sweden-shows-that-the-uk-s-third-wave-won-t-sting … https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&time=2020-03-01..latest&pickerSort=asc&pickerMetric=location&Metric=Confirmed+deaths&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=true&Align+outbreaks=false&country=GBR~SWE~ISR … I wonder why….
pic.twitter.com/mtTxQz9egZ
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Revisiting this idea of protecting the vulnerable, I don’t understand why it is presented as a choice between two mutually exclusive alternatives. Wasn’t it possible to ensure protection of the vulnerable during lockdowns? If it were possible, why wasn’t it done? If it worked…
-
..*in the real world* wouldn’t it result in reduced death rate and end the lockdowns? I think you’re trying to hide the failure of your idea, which worked only in Sweden thanks to favorable circumstances (with average results), while presenting unreproducible result as a proof.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The "'non-essential' laptop class" -- LOL, funny because it's true.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.