I think an important part of scientific research might be disclosure of all information that was collected, even that which was not included in the statistics, with an explanation why it wasn’t included. Similarly, when pointing out that someone made a mistake, include …
The hierarchy of scientific discourse by @paulg. For best views of the world we live in, let's meet at the top of the pyramid.pic.twitter.com/XqB9trYRe6
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This could apply to Twitter arguments. We don't get high up on the pyramid that often...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He forgot one important level of today's scientific "discourse".pic.twitter.com/ISZwIrIyEP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The lost of convergence as it tends to support that his/her hypothetical statement will always be proven right
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Let it rip” is unethical and dangerous. Your turn.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes siree! and don't try to do it on Faceb=-k. Pyramid does make the point; politicians aspiring shy well away from the top of the pyramid. Problem here because they represent those of us who do not shy away. Instructive on 'who to vote for'.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This hierarchy does not include an important part of discourse, which is simply cancelling out the inconvenient voices.
-
That'll be the ground the pyramid stands on, right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.