There are plenty of experts on cost-benefit analysis who disagree with this perspective.
-
-
-
...And put the reference? Serious debate is like that, it is not enough against arguing a text based on your opinion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
CORRECT; I have never seen a shred of credible (government) research into the plethora of obscene elements of colateral damages done & still being done by the ongoing cycles of lockdowns, other restrictions & planned repeats for this coming autumn & winter
. #ProtectionRacket -
Let’s begin with understanding why the most vulnerable weren’t protected. What could’ve been done to realize GBD’s premise that if we protect the vulnerable the result could be better? What was done in practice to protect the most vulnerable? What failed and why?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And „costs“ are definitely not just financial costs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From my perspective, there’s a lot of one-sided analysis in the published article, as I doesn’t mention side effects from covid infection (besides death). This is not how science works. These two are much more comprehensive. https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/second-opinions/93055 … https://www.medpagetoday.com/opinion/marty-makary/93029 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The term of art for this phenomena is "Middle Class Equity Extraction". It is not about keeping people safe from a virus that is really just a serious flu, it is about social control and the "Great Reset". Ie: "You will own nothing and be happy." - Klaus Schwab.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.