Martin Kulldorff on Twitter: "Dear Dr. @angie_rasmussen, Thank you for proving three of my points. Focused protection is the opposite of let-it-rip, by minimizing both #COVID19 mortality and collateral public health damage. Happy to do a public debate with you, unless you wish to prove a fourth point of mine.… https://t.co/gBhAuTmuVO"

@MartinKulldorff

Professor Harvard Medical School. Disease surveillance methods. Infectious disease outbreaks. Vaccine safety. Free SaTScan, TreeScan and RSequential software.

Boston, USA

Country	Code	For customers of
United States	40404	(any)
Canada	21212	(any)
United Kingdom	86444	Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
Brazil	40404	Nextel, TIM
Haiti	40404	Digicel, Voila
Ireland	51210	Vodafone, O2
India	53000	Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
Indonesia	89887	AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
Italy	4880804	Wind
3424486444	Vodafone
» See SMS short codes for other countries

‏ @MartinKulldorff

Dear Dr. @angie_rasmussen, Thank you for proving three of my points. Focused protection is the opposite of let-it-rip, by minimizing both #COVID19 mortality and collateral public health damage. Happy to do a public debate with you, unless you wish to prove a fourth point of mine.https://twitter.com/angie_rasmussen/status/1385997230134337539 …

Dr. Angela RasmussenVerified account @angie_rasmussen

In which Dr. Kulldorff uses the same tactics he criticizes to wallow in his own self-pity & distort the issues rather than engage in “proper debate.” And I’d suggest that Team Let ‘Er Rip is not being silenced or censored since they regularly whine about it here & on Fox News. pic.twitter.com/GmAtYHYaZe

4:15 AM - 27 Apr 2021

311 Retweets
1,667 Likes

76 replies 311 retweets 1,667 likes

1. Jeff Graham‏ @MentionedByJeff Apr 27
  Replying to @MartinKulldorff @angie_rasmussen
  
  It seems public debate isn’t their thing. They’re more comfortable with mischaracterizing views that aren’t in line with the failed policies they advocate for.
  
  2 replies 5 retweets 59 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Show replies
1. Co-Immunity‏ @Co_Immunity_ Apr 27
  Replying to @MartinKulldorff @angie_rasmussen
  
  Co-Immunity Retweeted Co-Immunity
  
  @angie_rasmussen would never advocate for silencing or censorship...https://twitter.com/Co_Immunity_/status/1317769817533915139 …
  
  Co-Immunity added,
  
  Co-Immunity @Co_Immunity_
  
  Replying to @MartinKulldorff @SWAtlasHoover
  
  Dr. Angela Rasmussen on "scientific debate" pic.twitter.com/p3pYiaQGkw
  
  6 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Brandon P. Reines‏ @Brandon75311349 Apr 27
  Replying to @MartinKulldorff @angie_rasmussen
  
  Yes please God can we have open scientific debate, instead of recrimination.
  
  1 retweet 25 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. daveminyo‏ @daveminyo Apr 27
  Replying to @MartinKulldorff @angie_rasmussen
  
  Team 'focused protection' might get mistaken for team 'let her rip' a little less often, if the former - although a great idea in theory- never tends to work in practice and almost always morphs into the latter by default. Could it be because it doesn't work maybe??
  
  7 replies 4 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo
1. Show replies
1. Cognitive Empathy‏ @CognitiveEmpat1 Apr 27
  Replying to @MartinKulldorff @angie_rasmussen
  
  I look forward to this debate. I hope it has two parts: (i) They let it rip and get everything out (including objectives), (ii) They then talk calmly about how a global inquiry could be designed to maximise learning.
  
  1 retweet 2 likes
  Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
  
  Undo