I have a 20 year old child (young adult) who was diagnosed last Friday and is already better. They need to get these shots to the elderly and those at highest risk. I just don’t know why this is so hard to accomplish.
Those in their 20s, 30s and 40s who take the #COVID19 vaccine, they are depriving vaccines from older people that have a hundred times higher risk of dying. Unless they care for geriatric patients, that is unethical.http://gbdeclaration.org
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As usual, spot on. Very sad that this has become the contrarian view.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think can claim that individual accepting a vaccine is acting unethically or actively depriving others It is the vaccination programme that is unethical, not the individual themselves
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Even more so if they have antibodies...
-
I'm convinced. In my 50s but feel 21 so No Vax for me. To save the elderly Obviously !
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is your take on people currently getting vaccinated that already had COVID?
-
People who have already had
#COVID19 do not need the vaccine. Available vaccine doses should instead be used for those that do need it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But these vaccines haven’t been even remotely adequately studied in the elderly.https://thehighwire.com/23-dead-in-norway-after-covid-vaccinations-reports-medicines-agency/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So we have terrified 100% to think they need a jab to escape the oppression but now you are happy to demonise those who have been branded 'granny killers"as selfish... Nice work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.