Which begs the question; who is in charge of the “balance” when all scales tilt in one direction? Is that not the goal of the method—to find the way?
A @UMassAmherst faculty blog "for balanced discussion of Covid19 data and policy" since "scientific and policy-oriented discussion of Covid has become polarized .. resulting in lack of real dialogue .. and self-censorship." @rosie_cowell @CarloDallapicc1
https://blogs.umass.edu/covidbalance/
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Look at India.. people done with rona.. life back to normal.. festive season over.. no sign of second wave.. cases are plummeting.. community immunity working fine..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s good. But still no one points to the deeper scientific problem: continued dominance of the germ theory as an explanatory framework. Of course Massachusetts older-age Covid mortality creates the impression of higher real mortality. We need the ecosocial model of disease NOW!
-
There is already plenty of ecosocial science. Haven't you heard about how black people are more likely to die due from covid due to underlying economic and social issues?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.