Agree an important perspective. I disagree that most GBD critics were focused on funding, but were asking for details of the plan & earnest debate, which was not forthcoming. @melindacmills @dgurdasani1 @BillHanage
-
-
If the young live normal lives, some will be infected, but their risk is less than from lockdown collateral damage. Pandemic will then be naturally over in 3-6 months. Lockdowns just prolonged the pandemic while completely failing to protect the old. 6/8
-
We do not know enough about
#COVID19 to accurately predict expected number of deaths, hospitalizations, or long-term health effect, under any strategy. With unreliable R0, IFR and HI estimates, Imperial College type models are not helpful. 7/8 - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If there are no policies or resources available to protect the vulnerable, does that mean the lockdowns/health orders should stay in place?
-
If they can implement lockdowns then they can implement the alternatives.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
well, depends on definition of
#HerdImmunity we'd settle on ...https://twitter.com/aier/status/1341911421018386439 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Few people <50 require hospitalization." I find this very difficult to square with the CDC data on hospitalization rates. The 18-49 year old age bracket has the highest illness rate & is hospitalized at a 10X higher rate from COVID-19 than in a severe flu season....pic.twitter.com/hV5OCc7JHP
-
This would imply a significantly higher burden on health care systems than your statement suggests. Can you clarify?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.