I been disappointed in the way some highly qualified voices have been treated. The polarisation caused helps no one and leads to mistrust. We need consensus and transparency to figure out the best way forward. This is way overdue i hope to see far more of this going forward.
Lockdown debate on @TheSohoForum, between @MartinKulldorff @harvardmed and @AndrewNoymer @UCIrvine. Both agree that open scientific discussion and academic freedom is important for pubic health. Enjoy!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6q-2eylEoI …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exchange of ideas is the best path forward. Thank you for your persistence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Because it is impossible outside vaccination. About 20 % of the US is over 65. About 100 million are over 50. Many at risk people are still in the work force. Discussion should shift to rapid vaccination of the at risk.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Well mannered debate, but no real evidence of rebuttals from Andrew other than to say the GBD looks good in theory but won’t work in real life and avoiding the fact the risk factors are already clear. Look forward to the next one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“It won’t work” is not science-based evidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.