In March-July 2020, ages 25-44, USA had 11,899 excess deaths compared to 2015-19, 38% from/with #COVID19 and 62% from collateral damage due to #lockdowns and excess fear. Article by @jeremyfaust @hmkyale @EMDocinTraining @Cleavon_MD @RWalensky et alhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2774445 …
-
That is not the conclusion of this study and you have purposely misrepresented it.
?? As an epidemiologist I offered my conclusion from the data presented. Independent thinking is important for science. Otherwise we have herd thinking.
-
-
Welcome to your opinion, for sure. However, your tweet could be understood as communicating our conclusion, which it did not. Science is progressive and you and others should feel free to express different interpretations.
-
and provide citations and evidence to support those interpretations. Or admit "you don't know" Sadly, too many are willing to push "interpretations" to support their narrative without the evidence to back it up.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please present the epidemiology evidence to support your conclusion the excess 68% mortality was from lockdowns and fear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You presented your conclusion as being the same as the authors’ conclusion. You can have whatever opinion you like, but you created a misleading tweet that misrepresented that conclusion of the paper, perhaps hoping no one would read it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then "as en epidemiologist" how about providing some substantive evidence from your claim. The onus is on the one making the claim to support it, otherwise you have no thinking. Just an ill informed opinion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.