Defending the resolution: Harvard Medical School Prof. @MartinKulldorff, a signer of the Great Barrington Declaration. Opposing: UC Irvine Epidemiologist @AndrewNoymer. I'll be moderating. Hope you can join me to ask questions and do Oxford-style voting.https://bit.ly/391DDW0
-
Can you just send me a link for their strategy to protect the vulnerable?
-
-
Thank you Martin. Is this an accurate summary of the government policies and resources needed to protect the vulnerable?pic.twitter.com/0cM5whIG3O
![- [ ] Frequent testing of nursing home staff and those visiting high risk people
- [ ] Sequestering infected nursing home residents
- [ ] Free Grocery delivery
- [ ] Free N95 masks
- [ ] 3-6 month sabbatical for at risk groups
- [ ] Workplace regulations to protect at risk
- [ ] Empty hotel rooms to house at risk currently living with younger people](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EnWeC1MXEAUqh7i.jpg)
-
I would add, as I've heard these esteemed epidemiologists mention, to also have those immune healthcare workers (already infected and recovered) be assigned to treat high risk people in hospitals, clinics, long term care facilities.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Martin, do you consider Sweden's reversal of policy and the experience of the Dakotas a counter to the model you propose in the GBD? Why not, if no?
-
The GBD first requires locking down and paying at least 40 million higher risk people for 3-6 months—another 50 million would presumably be retired or able to work from home. The only politician I know of who has proposed something like this is AOC.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.