#COVID19 mortality by USA congressional district and time. Ten highest: NY14, NY15, NY6, NY9, NY5, NY7, NY8, New Jersey 10, NY11, New Jersey 8.https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/covidmetricsuscongress …
-
Are you supposed to be a professional or just there to feed the vultures? How about a few FACTS on why NY was hit so badly? Or is that irrelevant now to so called professionals
NY did the opposite of what they should have. Protected low-risk students and young professionals, such as bankers, journalists and scientists working from home, while older high-risk inner-city working class people and nursing home residents were exposed.https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/todaysdebate/2020/10/22/covid-plan-would-minimize-mortality-lockdown-induced-damage-editorials-debates/3735800001/ …
-
-
Same as Sweden, or rather where C19 hit the hardest like in Stockholm among the poor and elderly. Timing and when restrictions were applied mattered. Sweden was not prepared and was too late too. Norway more successful in reducing C19 impact and their economy also suffered less.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And do tell me was New York privy to all this information Feb 2020 or did it take months of scientific study of which all scientists still do not agree on the best strategy?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The approach (not unique to NY) actually doubled down by increasing the exposure to high risk persons then forcing those exposed into their high density multingeneral homes for weeks.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A Harvard medical school professor directs us to (checks notes) a USA Today editorial he co-wrote, lacking an evidence, to support his distortion of available data. I'm assuming NYT, WSJ, WP, et al., took a hard pass? Point us to your peer reviewed studies on the subject, pls.
-
Can you show me peer reviewed study on lockdowns?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps rather than continuing to state the obvious (that we need to protect the most vulnerable) and poo-pooing the current efforts of those trying to mitigate the crisis, you could propose a means of protecting the vulnerable while allowing uncontrolled spread of the virus. Hm?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly how would your plan have helped nursing home residents in the NYC area? You hype your plan 24/7, but you never give any specifics. Just vague handwaving about protecting the vulnerable.
-
Agreed. However I lost interest in his opinion since finding out he faked a number of signatures from scientists on his article
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is what they should have done, and should still do.https://rationalground.com/a-rational-reopening-guide/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.