Even if one disagrees with you, they must vet this principle in order to create a cogent counter argument. The stifling of discourse should not be tolerated nor encouraged by anyone esp those claiming to be "experts" on a virus that is novel.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A true gentleman, genuine, knowledgeable and compassionate. Sadly i cannot say that for the experts sat on sage or who fill our media.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Excellent interview, Professor! I am going to send it to everyone I know—many are not on Twitter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Signed with enthusiasm! ‘But trying to suppress the disease with contact tracing, testing and isolation, together with severe lockdowns, is not going to solve the problem. It will just push things into the future.’ Thanks
@MartinKulldorffThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To argue against
@MartinKulldorff, you have to adopt a population medicine framework. Now suppose you "beat" him and your argument wins the day. Good on you. But guess what? The larger battle would have been won by both you and Kulldorff, because you're using a sane framework. -
Thats why this whole thing is not about the C19 corona virus. It was and still is about control and power. Finding out how many liberties the people were willing to give up for "Security" and "Safety".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you for standing up for us. I will never forget it.
-
Neither will I. Amazing man and doctor.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.