I guess @MartinKulldorff of Harvard Medical School also doesn't know what he's talking about, @peterstaley? https://twitter.com/MartinKulldorff/status/1309885419694288896?s=19 …https://twitter.com/peterstaley/status/1309848922530230274 …
-
And I agree too, Martin. But Atlas said, "there is cross-immunity, highly likely from other infections, and there is also T-cell immunity. And the combination of those makes the antibodies a small fraction of the people that have immunity." There's NO EVIDENCE to back that up.
Thanks Peter. Journalist question was whether "more than 90% of the population remain susceptible to coronavirus". Glad we all agree with Atlas that it is less, as there is immunity without antibodies. How much less is impossible to know, and you are welcome to argue about that.
-
-
We don’t all agree, Martin. You are dodging the recklessness of Atlas’s conclusion. You’re not saying it now, but you support his approaching-herd-immunity views. I’ve dealt with Duesberg, sir, and you and Atlas are no better. Just look at your vile Twitter supporters.
-
Ideas should always supersede superficialities. When you devolve into petty attacks (twitter supporters becomes the barometer to evaluate— never seen that on a serious rubric), you’ve lost your audience and the merits of your argument have been adulterated.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.