You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Thank you for explaining why this entire subthread is based on Kulldorff's false assumption. That's how Atlas rolls.
Hi Peter. Can you help explain? Is it only those with antibodies that are immune, or is the number higher than that? Atlas claims the latter. Fauci did not contradict that in the interview. Is the disagreement whether it is higher or how much higher?
I agree that measuring antibodies doesn't tell the full story w/ regards to exposure, the true number is likely higher. But the claims were about immunity (=protection). At this point *nobody* knows who is "immune" & for how long. Neutralizing antibodies are the closest measure
OK, there is agreement that number exposed > number with antibodies. So, the disagreement is whether exposure without antibodies generate protection? If not, one would think that we would have seen many reinfections by now. What do you think? I am really appreciating your help.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
