Never heard of "Trumpian" epidemiology! Gregg/, it is beneath you and any other scientist to make political insinuations/accusations as part of scientific discourse. Unhelpful and dangerous politicization of public health. Sad. twitter.com/gregggonsalves
Conversation
Martin: you went to a political magazine—not a scientific journal—to make a case that has little support among your peers, flies in the face of evidence and gives credence to bad policies, which are indeed supported by .
13
16
During a public health crisis we must communicate with the public, left and right. The age-targeted strategy that I advocate is supported by many peers, including professor at Oxford, the world's preeminent infectious disease epidemiologist. reaction.life/we-may-already
6
33
90
These people assume that everyone agrees that Trump is horrible, but that's only the case among those they personally know, not the whole world. All it accomplishes is an unnecessary alienation of their political opponents from science.
1
Anyone who brings President Trump into an epidemiology debate shouldn't be taken seriously.
It shows politics (and the strong emotions associated with it) is at the forefront of their mind.
2
23
A disturbing series of tweets from . Little in terms of dispute on the merit of your ideas. Too many political appeals, and appeals to authority. Poor recognition of the standards of truth. Is this what science has come to in 2020?
15
has given a lot of similar arguments, and he is absolutely NOT a supporter of Trump.
6