"Surprisingly, the alleged falsehoods are not mentioned, making scientific discourse difficult", but here is my letter in @StanfordDaily defending @SWAtlasHoover, criticized by 98 Stanford faculty members, and his age-targeted #COVID19 strategy.https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/09/16/letter-to-the-editor-scott-atlas-and-lockdowns/ …
-
Hmm... a scientist citing the
@WSJ? Awesome and it allows you to hide behind Rupert’s paywall. We are only beginning to see the tip of the iceberg relating to your “young asymptomatics” since they were largely quarantined until recently. Your “let it burn” strategy is criminal.
Hmm... I guess I was citing myself and a Stanford colleague. I do not like to hide though. Sorry about that.pic.twitter.com/sJK7OeqwOW
-
-
Thank you. Thank you for confirming my intial impression that you have little or no idea what you are talking about. Just to clarify, do you actually believe that the size and infectiousness of an asymptomatic population has no effect on the dynamics of the pandemic?
#viralload - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.