Rightfully. The most reckless among us have had the biggest megaphones.
-
-
Teşekkürler. Twitter bunu zaman akışını daha iyi hale getirmek için kullanacak. Geri alGeri al
-
-
-
Unfortunately I think you are right. I have been really concerned about how scientists describe weak to non existing evidence as really strong evidence.
-
Bu Tweet kullanım dışıdır.
- Yanıtları göster
Yeni sohbet -
-
-
starts to make you question everything they told you about climate change!
Teşekkürler. Twitter bunu zaman akışını daha iyi hale getirmek için kullanacak. Geri alGeri al
-
-
-
Yes, we are already there btw, people (correctly) do not trust experts anymore unless and until they have proof they won't mix their political preferences with their counsel. Which they almost always do so... people don't trust experts (and correctly so).
- Yanıtları göster
Yeni sohbet -
-
-
What's been stunning to me is how anchored so many scientists are. Instead of changing their views in light of clear and obvious new facts, they contort them to fit their original priors. Had always believed that scientists were most fact-based - now far less so.
-
I think that is because they were thinking this was their moment and highlight of their career! That, and they are politically motivated
Sohbetin sonu
Yeni sohbet -
-
-
I don't get it. It's not too diffucult to get out of this carousel unless you're too busy or you have some conflict of interest.
Teşekkürler. Twitter bunu zaman akışını daha iyi hale getirmek için kullanacak. Geri alGeri al
-
-
-
What specifically do you mean, Martin? I mean apart from the retracted NEJM/Lancet papers, the cherry picking of evidence in top journals as if Science is non-objective, or the overly risk-averse (at the cost of economy) clinical reaction to "things we don't know", what else?
- Yanıtları göster
Yeni sohbet -
Yükleme biraz zaman alacak gibi görünüyor.
Twitter aşırı kapasiteyle çalışıyor ya da anlık sorunlar yaşıyor olabilir. Yeniden dene ya da daha fazla bilgi almak için Twitter Durumu sayfasını ziyaret et.