Hi Eli, best scientific evidence: Sweden never closed day-care/primary schools, with zero COVID19 deaths and few hospitalized among 1.8 million children ages 1-15. It can spread in schools, but safer than flu, even with #OpenSchools at height of pandemic.
https://folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/c1b78bffbfde4a7899eb0d8ffdb57b09/covid-19-school-aged-children.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @MartinKulldorff @mugecevik
I’m not worried about the kids. I’m worried about the teachers and parents and grandparents. South Korea controlled the outbreak with testing and tracing, how’s that working in the US? Comparing US to other countries is not helpful
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @eliowa @mugecevik
Important considerations. Again, best evidence from Sweden. With schools open, compared to other professions, the
#COVID19 RR was 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.1) for day-care and 1.1 (95% CI 0.9-1.3) for primary school teachers. Sample size 260K. 1/2 https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/c1b78bffbfde4a7899eb0d8ffdb57b09/covid-19-school-aged-children.pdf …2 replies 5 retweets 16 likes -
With open schools in Stockholm, high-risk elderly age >70 that live with a working-age adult had the same
#COVID19 risk whether or not they also lived with children age <16. 2/2 https://su.figshare.com/articles/preprint/Residential_Context_and_COVID-19_Mortality_among_the_Elderly_in_Stockholm_A_population-based_observational_study/12612947/1 …2 replies 13 retweets 36 likes -
Replying to @MartinKulldorff @mugecevik
What’s your epi interpretation of this data? Kids don’t spread respiratory viruses? Not a hill I’d want to die on. Seems everyone is desperate for your conclusion though.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eliowa @mugecevik
As an MD you obviously know that children can spread respiratory viruses. So, I do not understand why you are asking the 2nd question. During a pandemic, it is important not to generate misunderstandings/misinformation.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @MartinKulldorff @mugecevik
Don’t think Sweden’s data is being used correctly. Since baseline risk of death in Sweden was 2x my state’s, I’m not reassured with internal comparisons of teachers, day care workers. It’s misleading. It’s not generalizable and is using the wrong control, so no internal validity
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @eliowa @mugecevik
To know the effect of
#OpenSchools during the pandemic, we need to utilize the data from the one place that kept schools open during the pandemic. Since teachers had no excess risk, schools/children are not major vectors spreading the disease (unlike influenza).2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Denmark had schools closed for 5 weeks only until we reopened schools again, step by step. We test intensively, so our infection rates per profession may be more comparable to test/trace/isolate approach than Sweden’s data. Education seems to have no elevated risk.pic.twitter.com/znbrMebvUA
3 replies 20 retweets 50 likes -
Replying to @Goldammerfeder @MartinKulldorff and
More data can be found here, under “Branchefordelte opgørelser” https://www.ssi.dk/sygdomme-beredskab-og-forskning/sygdomsovervaagning/c/covid19-overvaagning … It’s updated weekly. Denmark experiences atm some significant local resurges and still keeps schools open for <16y. Which brings me to the question: Do you talk to Scandinavian colleagues?
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Re COVID19, with colleagues in Sweden, yes, but not Denmark. Would be more than happy to. Thanks for sharing the occupational risk data. Very informative.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.