Viruses spread exponentially. 9=81=6561 people possibly being infected in a few weeks, if they only infect two other people each.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Must suck to not have empathy. Do some research and learn how to be human correctly before you hurt someone.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
See this is where knowledge comes in. It will take 70% of us to survive the virus to get herd immunity. AND herd immunity isn’t promised with this virus because one can get it repeatedly - more than once, so antibodies seem to be temporary with COVID-19.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No respectable epidemiologist will claim that 70% is needed to get herd immunity. Impossible to now yet. Repeated infections are extremely rare. I suggest you ignore any "knowledge" received from the same source.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is from a CDC scientist.
I don’t make things up.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Maybe you should provide a citation. Not appropriate to accuse the cadre of mostly excellent CDC scientists without backing it up.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I have direct contacts at the CDC. It is also an easy Google search as well as common knowledge so...https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/achieving-herd-immunity-with-covid19.html …pic.twitter.com/vZnhHzpiJO
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BlackParenting1 @MartinKulldorff and
"Depending on..." "Usually" That's not a scientific conclusion.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Dear @davidwdowdy
A JHU Q&A claims that "we will likely need at least 70% of the population to be immune to have herd protection" against COVID19. The % needed is impossible to know at this time. To avoid disinformation, I suggest removing that number.https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/achieving-herd-immunity-with-covid19.html …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.